It is useful for actors to publish additional structured information about themselves without necessarily defining an extension property or additional vocabulary. This FEP describes a way for actors to publish generic key-value pairs representing their metadata.
Mastodon v2.4.0 (March 2018) implemented “bio fields” [1], a feature that allows adding structured data to profiles. This feature was federated via the attachment field, filtering for array items that had a type of PropertyValue derived from schema.org’s vocabulary. Each item used name from the ActivityStreams Vocabulary, and value from the schema.org context. The schema.org namespace was defined as schema and (erroneously) mapped to http://schema.org# (instead of http://schema.org/ or https://schema.org) within the JSON-LD context property.
Misskey (December 2018) implemented “user fields” [2], following the same federation logic as Mastodon (filtering for a type of PropertyValue, then taking name and value).
Pleroma (August 2019) implemented “custom profile fields” [3], following the same federation logic as Mastodon (filtering for a type of PropertyValue, then taking name and value).
Rather than depending on an additional (and unnecessary) vocabulary, it makes sense to define a more “native” way of expressing the same idea of a key-value pair representing structured metadata about the actor. To this end, this FEP proposes using the existing Note type from the ActivityStreams 2.0 Vocabulary (instead of schema.org’s PropertyValue), as well as the existing content property (instead of schema.org’s value). Note that the name property exists within both the ActivityStreams 2.0 Vocabulary and the schema.org vocabulary, with largely the same semantic meaning; however, the use of schema.org vocabulary is out of scope of this FEP.
Thus, we can define a standard for actor metadata, largely drawing from prior art.
General-purpose actor metadata fields SHOULD be included in the attachment array on the actor. If a more specific property exists and is a better fit for the specific metadata being expressed, then implementations MAY use that instead of or in addition to the more generic actor metadata.
Note.name representing the name (key) of the field.content representing the content (value) of the field.Actor metadata fields may also take the form of a link rather than a content value.
Link.href representing the value of the link.name representing a label for the link.rel values if an appropriate link relation exists, such as "me".(This section is non-normative.)
Existing implementations currently using the incorrect IRIs http://schema.org#PropertyValue and http://schema.org#value may wish to maintain backwards compatibility during a transitional period by serving both legacy representations as well as representations according to this FEP. The following algorithm may be used to support the legacy implementations while also favoring the implementation within this FEP:
attachment array for items of type Note or Link. Take name and content from each remaining item if the type is Note, or take name and href if the type is Link. If the type is Link and the rel contains "me", attempt to verify this link using rel-me verification.attachment), filter the attachment array for items of type http://schema.org#PropertyValue. Take name and http://schema.org#value from each remaining item. If name is a duplicate of an existing name, ignore the item.After some transitional period, implementations may wish to simplify their logic by filtering only for items of type Note and drop support for http://schema.org#PropertyValue, http://schema.org#value, and the schema.org context entirely (assuming those implementations do not use any other vocabulary from the schema.org context).
Consider a profile which has the following profile fields:
Pronouns
: they/them
My portfolio
: https://example.com/
A legacy implementation might currently serialize these as such:
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"sc": "http://schema.org#"
"PropertyValue": "sc:PropertyValue",
"value": "sc:value"
}
],
"id": "https://social.example/someone"
"type": "Person",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "PropertyValue",
"name": "Pronouns",
"value": "they/them"
},
{
"type": "PropertyValue",
"name": "My portfolio",
"value": "<a href="https://example.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer me" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">example.com</span><span class="invisible"></span></a>"
}
]
}
For implementations that do not include the same incorrect IRI term mapping in their contexts, compaction would result in the following:
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"id": "https://social.example/someone"
"type": "Person",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "http://schema.org#PropertyValue",
"name": "Pronouns",
"http://schema.org#PropertyValue": "they/them"
},
{
"type": "http://schema.org#PropertyValue",
"name": "My portfolio",
"http://schema.org#PropertyValue": "<a href="https://example.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer me" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">example.com</span><span class="invisible"></span></a>"
}
]
}
Implementation according to this FEP might result in a simpler and more semantically correct serialization but equivalent representation like so:
{
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"id": "https://social.example/someone"
"type": "Person",
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Note",
"name": "Pronouns",
"content": "they/them"
},
{
"type": "Link",
"name": "My portfolio",
"href": "https://example.com",
"rel": ["nofollow", "noopener", "noreferrer", "me"]
}
]
}
CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication
To the extent possible under law, the authors of this Fediverse Enhancement Proposal have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this work.